Judge's Name:

Team Name:

Category 1: Vision for the Future of Insurance (10 Points)

10 - The team clearly identified a compelling vision for the future of insurance based on a well-defined problem/trend/technology/opportunity.9 - The team clearly identified a compelling vision for the future of insurance.8 - The team identified their vision and incorporated real-life examples/trends as the basis.7 - The team identified their vision with moderate examples.6 - The team adequately explained their vision but lacked a well-defined problem/trend/technology/opportunity.5 - The vision was explained but weak.4 - The vision was weak with little basis for the narrative.3 - The vision was unclear and lacked examples.2 - The vision was poor and inadequate.1 - The vision was not well conveyed.

Category 2: Creativity/Originality (10 Points)

10 - The vision shared was unique and well conceived.9 - The vision shared was highly creative and innovative.8 - The vision was creative but somewhat loosely conceived.7 - The vision had a fair level of creativity.6 - The vision was somewhat creative and had compelling aspects.5 - The vision contained minor creative aspects.4 - The vision was weak with little creativity.3 - The vision lacked originality.2 - The vision was common and generic.1 - The vision could have been found by Googling 'future of insurance'.

Category 3: Use of Data and Trends (10 Points)

10 - The vision was soundly based on extrapolating current and/or historical data to support their future vision.9 - The vision was well supported by extensive data.8 - The vision incorporated strong data points.7 - The vision used some reliable data sources.6 - The vision was inspired by current data/trends.5 - The vision contained minor data references.4 - The vision referenced at least one current trend or data point.3 - The vision referenced little data.2 - The vision lacked strong data support.1 - The vision was not based on any data/trends.

Category 4: Presentation Skills (5 Points)

5 - The team’s presentation was polished, articulate, and engaging with superb presentation skills.4 - The team’s presentation was organized and well-presented with engaging skills.3 - The team’s presentation was well-presented but average in organization and delivery.2 - The team’s presentation lacked preparedness and strong skills.1 - The presentation was poor and/or inappropriate for the competition.

Category 5: Bonus - Quality of Overall Case (5 Points)

5 - The team’s vision/video was innovative, creative, and would make a great presentation at the Symposium.4 - The team’s vision/video was appealing and easily understood.3 - The team’s vision/video was easy to follow.2 - The team’s vision/video was difficult to follow.1 - The team’s vision/video was poor quality and/or inappropriate for the competition.